Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score? (further testing beyond basic labs) 0, and no risk-enhancing factors
cac-zero-lowriskNo one has reached this rule yetReasonable to defer statin; reassess CAC in 3–7 years
No clinician has signed off this rule yet. It reflects our reading of the guidelines cited below, which has not been independently checked.
Word for word, as generated for the example person below. Figures in the text are theirs.
It's reasonable to defer statin therapy and reassess with a repeat scan in 3-7 years.
Your CAC score is 0 with no risk-enhancing factors on record, which is associated with a low near-term event rate. Two caveats: a zero means no *calcified* plaque, not no plaque, and it is least reassuring under about 45, the exact age band PESA studied directly. PESA, a Spanish cohort of 4,002 people with no heart disease, found that 63% already had atherosclerosis somewhere in their arteries on ultrasound, but only 18% had any coronary calcium. Most disease this early hasn't calcified yet.
2026 ACC/AHA/Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia · Class 2a
“Borderline risk, calcium score of zero” — an illustrative profile, not a real user.
Asked after: Chronic kidney disease, age 40–75, HIV, age 40–75, 10-year risk 5% to under 10%, 10-year risk 3% to under 5%, Low 10-year risk, high lifetime risk, Low risk with a major risk enhancer
Cited by the recommendations above.
For practising clinicians. Endorse it, propose a change, or dispute it. We verify every reviewer before a review is shown, and a review stays attached to the version of the rule you saw — if the rule changes, the page says so. You'll be asked to declare any relevant interests; they're shown with your review.
Log in or create an account to submit a review. An account is how we tie a review to a person we can verify.
Runs in lib/engine/lipidPathway.ts as cac-zero-lowrisk.