Your situation (severe hypercholesterolemia short-circuits the risk score) 10-yr risk 3–5% (borderline)
risk-borderlineNo one has reached this rule yetNo clinician has signed off this rule yet. It reflects our reading of the guidelines cited below, which has not been independently checked.
This is a routing step: it says nothing itself, and decides which rule applies next. For the example person, that is Borderline risk with a risk enhancer, Calcium score not measured and hs-CRP not measured.
“Borderline risk + high Lp(a)” — an illustrative profile, not a real user.
Asked after: No known cardiovascular disease
Then asks: A risk-enhancing factor that counts? (weighted — a single unconfirmed hs-CRP does not count until repeated)
Then asks: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score? (further testing beyond basic labs)
Then asks: hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L, confirmed on a repeat test? (further testing beyond basic labs)
For practising clinicians. Endorse it, propose a change, or dispute it. We verify every reviewer before a review is shown, and a review stays attached to the version of the rule you saw — if the rule changes, the page says so. You'll be asked to declare any relevant interests; they're shown with your review.
Log in or create an account to submit a review. An account is how we tie a review to a person we can verify.
Runs in lib/engine/lipidPathway.ts as risk-borderline.